From sewing circles to quilting bees, consciousness raising meetings to book clubs, women continue to meet to exchange ideas and support one another in our pursuit of……? When I heard Gloria (Steinem that is) talk about our need to communicate with other women, I was in a roomful of like minded women physicians—we all were devoted to making medicine a better place for the woman physician and women patients.
Having said that, I know that not everyone agreed with the uncompromisingly strong pro-choice stance Steinem makes. But still we all realized that our shared concerns, our shared interests, and in the end, our shared successes (no matter which ones you choose to pursue) were strengthened by sometimes agreeing to disagree while coming together whenever we could, when we agreed.
So back to the more intimate situations when women gather. Take my Busy Women’s Book Club. Sunday night we met for our annual movie and dinner. The best ever vegetarian, kosher, gluten free dinner ever! Fabulous hors d’oeuvres by Karen with potato/carrot/zucchini ? latkes dipped in guacamole and blueberry salsa. Ellen G.’s sweet and sour soup with tofu and fungus (had another more palatable name like elephant ears, I think). Judge Lisa’s greek salad made after a 9 hour drive up from New York that day. Susan made a quinoa salad, always well received. Ellen S. an artful bowl of grilled veggies—loved those brussel sprouts. Vickie with a bean/wild rice/dried sun tomatoes main dish. My contribution—eggplant lasagna (truth be told Sonia made it but I chose the recipe J). And Antoinette took the prize with the most delicious ever flourless chocolate cake with whipped cream for dessert after the movie. We missed Eileen and Stephanie.
Good thing the dinner was great. Rocky sailing after that. Our red-box film, starring Tom Hanks who was upstaged by the new-to-acting kid, Incredibly Close and Extremely Loud, was damaged and couldn’t be fixed. Not with Windex, not with slow forward, not with flipping it. Oh, so disappointing. Definitely gotta see it (and so far it really looked like it shoulda gotten the Best Picture award). Its clever handling of the incredible journey looking for the lock that fit the key was a most fabulous “special effect” I have seen in a very long time.
When we retired for the great dessert and some coffee/tea or more wine, we caught up on our news. Ellen S. is having an exhibit at the Burchfield Penny Art Gallery—a whole floor to herself in Buffalo’s newest museum. Judge Lisa has a new and prestigious position on one of her statewide judges’ committees. Kam Jam is taking off big time nationally but Vickie says she and Mitch are not yet ready to retire. Check it out at Bed, Bath and Beyond!
As for myself, I made a grave error. I shared some personal hopes and dreams. It was on a touchy subject—intermarriage. I must have touched a very raw nerve. The conversation turned a bit ugly. I found myself in the uncomfortable position of trying to defend my feelings about how this would affect my family. In fact, in a place I thought I was safe, with my book circle—now in its 5th year, I clearly upset someone whom I consider a friend because I shared my hopes and dreams, my concerns and my compromises.
The interchange upset me so much that I couldn’t sleep that night or the next. Now, with a few days gone by, and not too few conversations with others (not in the club), I am more at peace. I know what I need to say (or write because I am somewhat of a coward and I do better on paper) to this person so that she knows my sentiments are those that guide my life, not a comment on what she believes or on how she lives her own.
My friend and colleague, Dr. Jean Shinoda Bolen, has written so much about sacred circles. I have always wanted to be in one. After 5 years of meeting and talking about our feelings through the books we read, I made an assumption that the group was “safe.” Like I always say in my professional life, never assume anything. Better to know. Now I do.
2 Comments
Linda - sacred circle? The complexities of two people interacting are enormous ….3, 4, 5 people? One is playing Russian roulette with sensitivities, emotions, history, and inherent bias.
I love your blogs - perhaps because I work 24/7 and this is my vicarious taste of a social life. Coming off from five years of literally minuscule time for friends I’m able to see what drama needlessly surfaces and how questions often navigate the way for laying my heart out on the table. Talk about a coward - I have come to the point of vetting almost every opinion because of the repeated experience of not being entitled to one if it wasn’t in sync with the other.
EQ development brings a lessening of judgementalness - your friend having her feelings hurt (reading between the lines) doesn’t have as much to do with you as it does with her history and the resulting sensitivity. I don’t know if by intermarriage you are referring to Judaism or race or some other non-common denominator
Of the important aspects to consider in a marriage; age, race, religion, education, social economic, nationality — perhaps the least consequential is race — yet that is the one variable we are all impacted by the most. Why? Because it is the easiest to identify and by those who have no understanding of the perfect match the other attributes of the relationship may ( or may not) be. For any parent assessing the impact that ANY huge disparity between ANY of the major aspects that contribute to defining a person may have on a marriage — it really says nothing more than awareness of and concern for the challenges of that difference on the marriage - on future children - on family dynamics. We always think it is a prejudice –rarely is it that simple. Thankfully at our age we are seeing that differences matter much less and healthy, mature, adult children can make good from the heart decisions. From my perspective intelligence (and education secondarily) is the biggest element leading to success or failure in a marriage. EQ and IQ. Balance among these elements is paramount to any chance at happiness
My advice my friend is forgive your friends harsh response and know for some reason she has a hurt in her past that relived a past pain — you have a wonderful heart and while the Dr Brodsky outside is a little in ones face (smile) the soul is a warm and loving - non-judgemental one. So now ladies’s while on a plane headed from SAN to PHL I have had my vicarious girl time - typos and all! But tonight in Philly I have dinner with a long time friend- she lost her husband days before Christmas - we will have hours of non-stop talk - so I will really have my fix!!
Thanks Deb for reading and writing. It hurts as much to have caused a mis-understanding as to have been misunderstood. I have sent what I think is a nice note back and hopefully the friendship will be strong enough to endure differences of world view.
BTW, we were talking about religious intermarriage.